Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LOA-CFA

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 20:20, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

LOA-CFA

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is a long-term orphan and long-term unreferenced. I cannot verify the contents, and the subject is not notable. (A recent PROD was removed by an IP user without substantive improvement to the article). Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:00, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:24, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, wumbolo ^^^ 05:35, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete I don't see this article ever getting better. Lovelylinda1980 (talk) 07:33, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG and has no coverage. AmericanAir88^(talk) 01:40, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.