Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Labor Law Plus
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:38, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
Labor Law Plus
- Labor Law Plus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable firm with no coverage in RS and only sourced to PRs, run of the mill mentions. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:40, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 00:35, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 00:35, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - agreed, nothing here or found in searches. Tacyarg (talk) 04:15, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete-fails WP:CORP, article created by paid editor.--Rusf10 (talk) 02:07, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.