Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lacy Neff

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 10:58, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lacy Neff (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: as insufficiently notable radio personality. Quis separabit? 16:43, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 02:06, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 02:06, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of West Virginia-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 02:06, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete non-notable local radio personality.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:05, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Local radio personalities do not get an automatic presumption of notability just for existing — while the Marconi Award might be credible as a "more notable than the norm claim" if it was sourced to media coverage about the award wins instead of to the award's own primary source website about itself, it doesn't confer an automatic inclusion freebie either. The sourcing here is not solid enough to get him over WP:GNG. Bearcat (talk) 17:02, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.