Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lakshmi Devy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Lourdes 14:08, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lakshmi Devy

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non notable actress and screenwriter, it is very clearly fails Wikipedia:ACTOR, there no reliable sources to pass WP:GNG. All signs of UPE. 2601:281:8180:50E0:995D:8BDF:2651:DAD8 (talk) 06:26, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Completing nomination on behalf of IP editor. Above text is copied from article talk page. I have no opinion of my own at this time. --Finngall ^talk 03:13, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I created this page as per WP:NACTOR policies. She has played significant role in 3 notable films. Murgh Krahi (talk) 07:22, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:13, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:13, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:13, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:14, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Nom cites lack of reliable sources, but article seems to be well sourced and the articles demonstrate significant coverage of the subject. Passes WP:ANYBIO. pburka (talk) 13:20, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

pburka, please share where you are finding in-depth references for her work that are not passing mentions. 46.249.231.163 (talk) 09:48, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The sources in the article are reliable and significant. They appear to have been published in newspapers, and the actor is the primary topic: her name appears in the headlines! Those are obviously not passing mentions. pburka (talk) 14:35, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The sources are just routine mentions and DGG has explained this several times what is routine and what i reliable. Routine coverage cant be considered relaible.213.128.189.149 (talk) 14:26, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think you're mixing up WP:RELIABLE and WP:SIGCOV. pburka (talk) 15:01, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, there are no sources, most of her roles are minor. It is created by UPE, it is a violation of Wikipedia as per G7, Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Thisisfamoe19877/Archive, he is one of socks of Famoe left to caught and if we do CU, there will be 100 accounts for him. GSS, has already flagged some of his pages already in the past. There are high chances of votes stacking on this page. 46.249.231.163 (talk) 09:44, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Her role was not of even 5 mins in the two movies out of three she has worked. It was more like special appearances rather than any mainstream role. 46.249.231.163 (talk) 09:52, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think this person has personal problem with the actress because he first tagged this page for deletion without knowing the policies for actors and then they accused me for paid editing. The actress played main lead role in notable films. Murgh Krahi (talk) 10:09, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Although this is not a right place, let me know where I can send the proof that Murgh Krahi is a paid editor from Famoe sock farm. 213.128.189.149 (talk) 14:26, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Since you're the nominator, you can't !vote so, I have changed it to comment. GSS ^💬 15:37, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Passes WP:NACTOR. - FitIndia ^{Talk Commons} 07:37, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep: I think there are just enough roles to pass WP:NACTOR, and sourcing doesn't seem too big a problem. Here is another source: https://deadline.com/2017/09/don-buchwald-associates-cassandra-freeman-bohemia-group-lakshmi-devy-1202174014/ – Deadline Hollywood. I don't really see any reason to delete this article. Dflaw4 (talk) 12:04, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.