Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LanguageWire

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:47, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

LanguageWire

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This has a bunch of cites, but none of them meet WP:CORPDEPTH - just the usual press release churnalism and funding announcements. It should also be noted that this article is the product of COI editors. This ought to be deleted. MrOllie (talk) 21:36, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:57, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:57, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:58, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:00, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:00, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, fails GNG and CORP. Nothing from IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.

Source eval table:

// Timothy :: talk 22:11, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I mostly concur with Timothy's evaluation, while the second mentioned source, borsen.dk is generally thought to be reliable, it is unfortunately pay-walled, making it hard to consider it's coverage. askeuhd (talk) 06:23, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - As per TimothyBlue's ref assessment.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:53, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. None of the available sources meet WP:CORPDEPTH. Shawn Teller (talk) 21:40, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.