Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lara Bloom (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. --MelanieN (talk) 23:40, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lara Bloom

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article that was deleted by consensus after this AFD. She doesn't seem to have gotten any more notable in the meantime but the first AFD was so long ago I'm submitting it again. Vrac (talk) 17:56, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y_SA ^{Y L}E _S 19:51, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y_SA ^{Y L}E _S 19:51, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y_SA ^{Y L}E _S 19:51, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Agree that renomination rather than G4 was probably the right step, but she hasn't become notable since the last time this was deleted. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 04:05, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Roscelese. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 21:29, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:54, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Indeed seems to fail WP:BIO. --— Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 07:25, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.