Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Larry g(EE)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn by nominator Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 12:41, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Larry g(EE)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject has received passing mention in multiple reliable sources but none that appear to be significant coverage, therefore subject does not appear to pass WP:GNG. Furthermore, subject does not appear to be notable as set forth in WP:ANYBIO or WP:MUSBIO. Therefore, I propose that this article be deleted. RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 06:23, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by nominator although it is my opinion subject does not pass WP:ANYBIO or WP:MUSBIO, given that the subject has a rather long blog written about him in the Dallas Observer, I am withdrawing my nomination. IMHO the Dallas Morning News source is not very in-depth.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 00:56, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 06:23, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 06:23, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 March 25. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:42, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the article in dallas news and 2 articles in culture brats are enough to get it over the WP:GNG barrier. These all have substantial contnet. I do note that some other references are just a passing mention. But the 3 are enough. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:54, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.