Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Last Chance to Reason

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep: nomination withdrawn. —C.Fred (talk) 20:41, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Last Chance to Reason

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject has not received significant coverage in reliable sources. The article's only sources are a press release from the band's record label, a Wordpress blog, and two articles from a website that does not have a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy Hirolovesswords (talk) 06:16, 6 January 2014 (UTC) Withdrawn - Notability established by Gongshow's sources. --Hirolovesswords (talk) 21:03, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 09:40, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Maine-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 09:40, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - two Allmusic reviews [1][2], two more at Exclaim! [3][4], and a Noisecreep article on the band's singer joining another band [5]. I'm not seeing much else in reliable sources, but these write-ups in my view satisfy WP:GNG and WP:BAND. Gong show 20:07, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per User:Gongshow's sources plus these: [6], [7], [8], [9] - not all really significant but the coverage as whole is sufficient to satisfy notability guidelines, and it's usually the case that metal bands with this sort of coverage online have further coverage in print sources that don't show up on Google searches. --Michig (talk) 20:41, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 January 7. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 20:35, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.