Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LatBus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. per SK1 (Had I been aware of the first !vote I would of closed it - The delete !vote is simply about it being a one liner and the !vote mentions nothing about sources, ~~And just to state the obvious CNMall41 I don't nominate articles and hope they're cleaned up!, If I cannot find sources it gets nominated but if people can find sources then I'll close it....~~), Anyway really not sure how on earth I didn't find anything but obvious Keep, Thanks to those who've found sources. (Amended per note left on my TP[1]) (non-admin closure) –Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 15:33, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

LatBus

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable bus company, Fails GNG –Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 21:43, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Has had extensive regional coverage (La Verdad and La Opinion de Murcia) plus some coverage by national media Cadena SUR, Europa Press, ditto. Also covered by 20 Minutos, Reason, La Informacion; articles are short but there are many of them. Thisisnotatest (talk) 07:52, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:19, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:19, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:19, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or actually write an article; it's only ONE sentence. MiracleMat (talk) 05:31, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Deletion is not cleanup or a way to get people to expand an article. There are plenty of reliable sources that cover the topic and as such meets WP:GNG.--CNMall41 (talk) 07:12, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Meets WP:GNG. Additional sources include, but are not limited to [2], [3], [4], [5], more... North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:41, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.