Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LaunchDon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:33, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

LaunchDon

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This new company does not have significant coverage in independent reliable sources. The hiphopdx and and vladtv.com references are passing mentions (LaunchDon is not "featured" in these references, as misleadingly claimed in the article text). The triplehq reference is a dead link. LaunchDon is not mentioned at all in the abc13 and dayandadream references. Edgeweyes (talk) 19:28, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:44, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:44, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:44, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:45, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:12, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: An article on a recently-launched enterprise. Notability is not conferred by passing mentions or game sponsorship. The claim to uniqueness in its field is sourced to a dead link but identical wording can be found here, indicating it was a press release. (There are also pre-existing platforms offering music business advice, such as this in the UK.) Searches return a Q&A promotional item but no evidence of attained notability, whether by WP:CORPDEPTH or WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 08:01, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable, article is merely a vehicle fo WP:PROMO. — O Fortuna^{semper crescis, aut decrescis} 14:39, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.