Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laurel Kenner

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 16:59, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Laurel Kenner

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP lacking independent references Rathfelder (talk) 07:37, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:14, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:14, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:15, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:15, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May be notable. Needs improvement. A New Yorker profile of Victor Niederhoffer has this mention "The mother of Niederhoffer’s son, Aubrey, who is one and a half, is Laurel Kenner, a former editor at Bloomberg whom he met in 1999. " They did not wed. Also here: [1] They did co-author a book. Other sources:

"Tall storys before a fall Self-promoting chief executives and swanky skyscrapers usually signal disaster ahead," The Telegraph [2]E.M.Gregory (talk) 12:31, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete At this time there is no significant coverage. It doesn’t take much looking before you run into “people search website” territory... that’s not good. Trillfendi (talk) 17:52, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I ran some more searches, but there really does not seem to be enough to support an article. Feel free to ping me if you can source it persuasively, I'm always willing to reconsider when sources are found.E.M.Gregory (talk) 23:06, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.