Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laurent Grison

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Unanimous consensus, after blocking the socks. Drmies (talk) 02:55, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Laurent Grison

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article doesn't have any reliable sources that establish the notability of this person, and I can't find any. The article has been created and aggressively promoted by single-purpose accounts such as Torontofrenchpoetry2 (talk · contribs) and Australianpoets134 (talk · contribs). Graham87 09:38, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I see nothing in the article worth keeping. VegasCasinoKid (talk) 09:45, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:21, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:21, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:21, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:21, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Thanks Graham and VegasCasinoKid for your recent notes and comments. I have added reliable sources to establish the notability of Laurent Grison. Is that better now? Thanks again.--A. Sise (talk) 08:03, 27 March 2016 (UTC) — A. Sise (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Delete as this is still questionable for the applicable notability at best. SwisterTwister talk 06:21, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as this article has been deeply improved.--Louise Ecitre (talk) 05:47, 2 April 2016 (UTC) — Louise Ecitre (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Keep as this is no more questionable for the applicable notability at best.--Hector Deparis (talk) 05:57, 2 April 2016 (UTC) — Hector Deparis (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Keep. Reliable sources have been added to establish the notability of L. Grison.--S. Ebold (talk) 07:47, 2 April 2016 (UTC) — S. Ebold (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.