Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:04, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lee Records

Lee Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Page recently created by a now-indeffed new account, Nbagangboy (but G5 doesn't apply because it was created before their block). Article currently entirely unsourced; looking for sources, I find some references to historic labels called 'Lee Records', but didn't find anything about this company that would pass CORPDEPTH. GirthSummit (blether) 17:27, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. GirthSummit (blether) 17:27, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. GirthSummit (blether) 17:27, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. GirthSummit (blether) 17:27, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee Records, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.