Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leitchford Bridge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 10:47, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Leitchford Bridge (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable bridge within a nature reserve. If it is indeed somewhat notable, perhaps could be integrated into Cleghorn Glen but not deserving of its own article. Adam Black ^{talk • contribs • uploads • logs} 16:23, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:29, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:29, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Nothing but a stub about a footpath bridge, with no refs or claim to notability after four years. It has had no content edits since the one creating it. Meters (talk) 21:54, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as 4 years it's been here and not one source's ever been added, Edited once in 2011, 2013 and 2014 ... So I would say this is quite honestly not even notable whatsoever. –Davey2010 • (talk) 22:50, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.