Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Letters to Elora

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 02:43, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Letters to Elora

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely unreferenced article about a band who broke up in 2008, and had never actually achieved anything that satisfied WP:NMUSIC in the first place: the most substantive claim here is winning an award at the Toronto Independent Music Awards, which is not major enough to satisfy NMUSIC #8. As always, Wikipedia is not a free publicity platform on which a band is automatically entitled to an article just because they existed; RS coverage must verify passage of a specific NMUSIC criterion for an article to become earned. Literally the only reason I'm not just pulling the speedy trigger on this is because it was created in 2007 and has somehow managed to fly under the radar for an entire decade. Bearcat (talk) 18:26, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Musicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 18:26, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 18:26, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I agree. Certainly seems to fail WP:NMUSIC. It's a little bit impressive that it has stuck around this long.bojo | talk 18:31, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.