Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Libelle (toy)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 18:35, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Libelle (toy)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Libelle (toy) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
After 10 years of a notability tag (and 4 years of an unreferenced tag) this unsourced stub has no indication of notability Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:43, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. Could not find anything on a basic WP:BEFORE except some manuals (not even sure if they are the same product) and Wikipedia mirrors. ☆ Bri (talk) 17:34, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:44, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete No sources to establish notability. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:57, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete, does not meet WP:GNG, a gsearch brings up nothing useable for this toy or the company, did find this so toy did exist, no article in German WP for this toy (see here) or the company Scheny (see here) so appears to be quite an obscure toy and company. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:48, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.