Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liberty Bus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:29, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Liberty Bus

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No WP:SIGCOV, fails WP:NCORP. ProtobowlAddict ^talk! 22:58, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. ProtobowlAddict ^talk! 22:58, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Ohio. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:18, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Agree with Protobowl above. Lacks WP:SIGCOV XwycP3 (talk) 02:53, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Nothing that meets WP:ORGCRIT in Google News, Google Search, or Google Books. --CNMall41 (talk) 22:46, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails notability criteria for reasons already mentioned. silviaASH (inquire within) 07:37, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete: Fails WP:NCORP and WP:SIGCOV due to a lack of significant coverage in reliable, independent sources, which a Google search did not reveal. There's no clear evidence of a lasting impact on the industry. If reliable sources are found, the article could be improved; otherwise, deletion seems appropriate. PriyasVP (talk) 09:08, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete: Agree with lack of notability, based primarily on lack of evidence of sources beyond company website (which gives no indication of when it was designed). In theory, the article could see work with the right source content, but it has essentially remained in limbo for 20 years now. -SteveCof00 (talk) 10:09, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not well sourced. May be better as draft for the time being. Or just deleted since it does not look notable. Ramos1990 (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.