Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Life skills in Canada

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Whereas potentially it could be notable, the current version is not based on reliable sources and thus fails WP:N. The intro was added during the nomination, but the main problem remains unaddressed.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:43, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Life skills in Canada

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Under a misleadingly generic title, a shameless promotion of a certain business. Basically single-source text. Staszek Lem (talk) 00:21, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 00:24, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. There's nothing different about life skills in Canada, as opposed to anyplace else (other than having to worship hockey). Clarityfiend (talk) 08:31, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Blatant self-promotion for own non-notable business. Excessive link-spam, no independent sources. GermanJoe (talk) 11:03, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Life skills are not a thing that vary from one country to another, meaning that this is really more of an advertisement for various organizations than it is an article about a thing. Bearcat (talk) 22:04, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Disregarding the blatantly inaccurate title, content appears promotional of that organization. 野狼院ひさし u/t/c 14:29, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:09, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

delete lifted completely from one source , the article looks complete POV without balanced sourcing. LibStar (talk) 10:07, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.