Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LikeALittle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:57, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

LikeALittle

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Failed site, not much coverage. Fails WP:NWEB. Störm (talk) 12:13, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. WP:CORPSPAM. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:27, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 12:37, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 12:37, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep passes WP:ORGCRIT as it has received significant coverage in reliable sources, which is already shown on the article page. It was featured in USA Today, The Toronto Star, Tech Crunch, etc. Cait.123 (talk) 13:02, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Zero indications of notability, another run-of-the-mill fails startup that once got some funding. Spammy article, including this gem in the lede "In 2011, TechCrunch reported that "Investors don't just like LikeALittle a little, they like it a lot."" Fails WP:SPIP. Topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺14:41, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.