Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lilblue Linux

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus to not keep this. No consensus about whether or not a redirect should be created. Anybody can do so editorially (and anybody else can then contest it at RfD). Sandstein 15:38, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lilblue Linux (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not seem to meet either WP:NSOFT or WP:GNG. All I could find was this source, which does not seem to be substantial from a GTranslate. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 10:04, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Non-notable software. Possibly soft-delete by redirect to list of Linux distributions or such. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:01, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:59, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: the Penguin Cabal is also now notified, SQUAAARK! Coolabahapple (talk) 23:06, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Jack Frost (talk) 07:11, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect I previously closed this as a redirect to List of Linux distributions and stand to that. I did not participate in the DRV to explain my previous close because I was unawre that it had been opened. If it is a problem that Lilblue Linux has no entry in this list, then somebody should add it to that list. Redirecting to the list is absolutely compatible with the nom and the above "delete" !vote. --Randykitty (talk) 15:29, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm on the fence about this. The problem is that List of Linux distributions is described as containing notable Linux distributions. So, if we've decided that a distro is not notable, then adding it to the list is contrary to the list's inclusion criteria. Perhaps the answer is to change the inclusion criteria to be more permissive, but that's another argument. -- RoySmith (talk) 18:56, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.