Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lily Eng

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The article's subject is found to have not met General N. Guideline. — Coffee // stole my cup // and beans // 01:18, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lily Eng

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

With a reference only to an article written by her dance partner and nothing else found, this article is about a subject who fails to meet notability guidelines. RichardOSmith (talk) 18:32, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No significance coverage. — Masum Ibn Musa ^Conversation 09:14, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:58, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:58, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:58, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As per nomination. Clearly does not meet WP:GNG.Peter Rehse (talk) 11:44, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.