Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lily Jay (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 13:26, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lily Jay

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reads like a promotional article (violating WP:PROMO), was recreated using almost all the same sources (along with a paywall link, 2 passing mentions (one being a bare mention on Top list on Buzzfeed), IMDB, now all removed). Apart from a possible non notable website MBSpost which is also inactive, everything else left in the article seems like a routine or WP:SPIP (BEFORE search finds nothing). She fails WP:GNG, WP:BIO. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 11:07, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:01, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:01, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:01, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:01, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Dance-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:01, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:CREATIVE. I cannot find any significant coverage. Jmertel23 (talk) 13:42, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Trillfendi (talk) 15:22, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:CREATIVE. St Anselm (talk) 20:13, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Could not see anything close to sufficient IRS to pass GNG or MUSIC or other. Aoziwe (talk) 12:59, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.