Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lily Snowden-Fine (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:10, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lily Snowden-Fine

Lily Snowden-Fine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable actress, Cant find any evidence of notability, Fails NACTOR & GNG. –Davey2010Talk 22:15, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'd forgot this was nominated at AFD and completely forgot I was the nominator - Anyway can't be bothered to CSD that article and this AFD so will just let this run its course (and plus someone could find something I haven't), Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 22:19, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:55, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:55, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:55, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. As little content as there actually is here, there's (surprisingly) still enough that's different from the prior version to forestall speedy as a "recreation of deleted content" — but still none of it is substantive enough, or reliably sourced enough, to grant her an WP:NACTOR pass. Actors and actresses do not get an automatic inclusion freebie just for existing; they must be reliably sourced to media coverage about them. But for "sourcing", what we have here is IMDb, another insignificant and non-notability-conferring database, and a history of Peppa Pig which just namechecks the existence of Peppa's voice actress while failing to be about Peppa's voice actress — and that is not the kind of sourcing that it takes to get an actress over the wikibar. Bearcat (talk) 06:13, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Fails WP:NACTOR. -- Dane talk 00:19, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Non notable actor --Cameron11598 (Talk) 02:31, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lily Snowden-Fine (2nd nomination), released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.