Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lima Publishing (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:51, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lima Publishing

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am re-nominating this article for AfD, due to the subject's non-notability, as pointed out by a previous AfD nominator. 76.235.248.47 (talk) 01:33, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I completed the AfD for the IP. ansh 666 17:58, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note the prior AfD had precisely zero other "votes" than by the previous nominator. [1] would be a primary source that this small corporation is "dissolved." Its online publication, not dissolved as a corporation, ICT for Education magazine appears extant, thus possibly providing a likely redirect/rename if others agree. Collect (talk) 14:36, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails GNG. Philafrenzy (talk) 09:20, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:50, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:25, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:25, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:26, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:26, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails GNG. Carrite (talk) 15:56, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.