Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Limnofish

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 10:34, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Limnofish

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable new journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 21:29, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:08, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:08, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, WP:TOOSOON, no evidence of notability yet. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:23, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Couldn't find anything to indicate an importance, fails WP:N. — JudeccaXIII (talk) 18:46, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Nothing to indicate notability of this journal. Fails WP:N AND NJOURNALS. Probably WP:TOOSOON. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 23:38, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - First published in 2015. Does not yet qualify as notable under WP:NJournals guidelines. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:23, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.