Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lint (material)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was really boring. April Fools' Day is over. (non-admin closure) Bsoyka (talk) 01:47, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
- Lint (material) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is the most boring thing ever. Who would want to read an article on lint? I guarantee you, there is nothing in the world more boring than lint. Nobody likes it! Delete. RteeeeKed💬📖 20:29, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
- Probably delete. I'm an omphaloSKEPTIC. Khemehekis (talk) 23:10, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.