Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lion-tech

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 14:02, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lion-tech

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Company appears to be non-notable on a cursory search of Google and Bing. Putting this up on AfD in case I'm missing something big. Lithorien (talk) 14:02, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:30, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:31, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:31, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lion-Tech is a fast growing company and its software is currently used by many users. The firm operates worldwide and collaborates with companies such as Microsoft. It is only a matter of time when will acquire global significance. Given that the sites of companies like Microsoft, Apple and a number of smaller IT companies exists on Wikipedia, I see no reason why not to allow even this page. :-) Capak89 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Capak89 (talk • contribs) 14:33, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Terms like "fast growing" and "only a matter of time" are merely predictive. Wikipedia has no "sites of companies"; at most it has pages about companies of demonstrable attained notability. AllyD (talk) 18:53, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The given references verify existence but not notability. Searches are not turning up any significant coverage of this Lion-Tech. (Note there is a similarly named battery firm in Taiwan.) Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 19:02, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 18:47, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:29, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per AllyD. C 679 12:06, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.