Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Song Sutton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. → Call me Hahc21 21:36, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lisa Song Sutton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person. Looks like a vanity article. Shritwod (talk) 13:45, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per lack of substantial covreage in reliable independent sources. Candleabracadabra (talk) 15:06, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Her listings on the usual model websites indicate that she's worked widely and prolifically. She even has a law degree.[1] However, I found none of the substantial independent coverage that we require to pass WP:GNG: the best I could find was a 2013 article in the Las Vegas Review-Journal about an alcoholic cupcake business she started with a partner.[2] --Arxiloxos (talk) 17:36, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I found an interview in a low-quality source here but I don't think that and the other sources are sufficient to meet WP:BIO. SmartSE (talk) 18:35, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:50, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:50, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:50, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.