Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of carbon ranches

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:18, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of carbon ranches (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

At current this is a page with a list of non-notable carbon ranches, with a couple of paragraphs about "carbon ranching", a subtopic of carbon farming. If we actually had articles on these ranches, the page might be worth keeping, but I'm not seeing any need for essentially a yellow-pages of ranches. Primefac (talk) 15:34, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Primefac (talk) 15:34, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. No indiciation of WP:LISTN and looks like it was just a student essay. There's also the issue that practically any ranch is sequestering carbon through grasslands, so we're kind of getting into WP:INDISCRIMINATE policy territory. It isn't a useful redirect term either. Kingofaces43 (talk) 17:04, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 17:49, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:LISTN and WP:NOTDIR. The term Carbon Ranch is not even notable itself. Ajf773 (talk) 20:16, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Wikipedia is not a directory.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:12, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.