Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of creatures by Impossible Pictures

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ST47 (talk) 04:43, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of creatures by Impossible Pictures

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I believe this falls under Wikipedia:Fancruft; this is a list of prehistoric animals that appear in certain documentary series and other random programmes (only connected by having been produced by the same company). It would be equivalent to a "List of animals that appear in National Geographic documentaries". It is completely unsourced and animals are identified down to the species-level, which they aren't in the programmes themselves, meaning that there is plenty of original research here as well. Ichthyovenator (talk) 22:40, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:56, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:56, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above. Much less reason to keep this than List of cloned animals in the Jurassic Park series. Lythronaxargestes (talk | contribs) 23:29, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable. Hemiauchenia (talk) 23:44, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete We've reached the electroweak scale of fancruft, where fiction gets mushed together with nonfiction and reality. This is even more fancrufty than many of the "List of X in work Y" articles that turn up regularly at AfD. Unlike lists about a specific work, its scope (works by Impossible Pictures, such as the Walking with... series) lacks a unifying trait. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 18:15, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the above. Not much else to say...surprised this ever existed to begin with. --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 03:07, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above Spudlace (talk) 03:44, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per everyone above. Fancruft at its best. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 18:44, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per norm. Duke of London (talk) 00:51, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.