Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of employment websites (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Mojo Hand (talk) 03:55, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of employment websites (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The companies listed here should be in Category: Employment websites. This list lacks criteria for inclusion and doesn't contain any information that warrants a separate article. HyperAccelerated (talk) 02:19, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep and improve. This is clearly a notable list, and will have no trouble meeting WP:LISTN. Cleanup may be required, but this is not the venue for that. BD2412 T 02:25, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note. I would also support as an alternative a merge and redirect to Employment website, both articles currently being rather short. BD2412 T 02:32, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    • Please make those improvements. You cannot simply assert that a subject is "clearly" notable, will have "no trouble" meeting notability guidelines, and then fail to provide sources that demonstrate that either of those two things are true. HyperAccelerated (talk) 02:33, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Websites, and Lists. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:19, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Navigational list are more useful than categories since they allow more information to be seen. Everything listed has its own Wikipedia article. When you click to edit you get a page notice telling you that. Dream Focus 08:26, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• SNOW Keep: Terrible deletion rationale. The article was also already previously kept in a unanimous vote. Why? I Ask (talk) 09:49, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Having a category and a list at the same time is common and not against the rules. Plus the inclusion category is defacto employment websites that have an article which is fine. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 15:54, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep- the existence of a category does not negate the notability of a list. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:57, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.