Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of figures in psychiatry (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 19:24, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

List of figures in psychiatry

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Part of the names in the list are psychiatrists (who already are in List of psychiatrists), the other names in the list are included based on entirely unclear criteria. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:16, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Psychiatry-related deletion discussions. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:16, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Psychology-related deletion discussions. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:16, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:21, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and probably WP:SALAT (too broad). Unclear inclusion criterion: "involved in the history of psychiatry"? Clarityfiend (talk) 22:29, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:02, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:INDISCRIMINATE. The first nom closed as no consensus per WP:NOQUORUM—not as if it was kept after extensive discussion. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 00:16, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as indiscriminate original research listcruft. Dronebogus (talk) 01:29, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per indiscriminate list with way too broad inclusion criteria. Not useful for any purpose. Vladimir.copic (talk) 08:01, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Just too broad a topic. Newshunter12 (talk) 20:43, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unmaintainable listcruft Avilich (talk) 02:03, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per WP:INDISCRIMINATE.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 04:52, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per WP:SNOW. ––FormalDude ^talk 08:27, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.