Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of programmable logic controller manufacturers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Programmable logic controller. (non-admin closure) YorkshireLad  ✿  ^(talk) 19:12, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of programmable logic controller manufacturers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable (and tagged for lack of notability since 2010) and unsourced. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:29, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 15:44, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 15:45, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Manufacturers of programmable logic controllers as a single topic has never received significant coverage in reliable sources. List therefore fails WP:LISTN 122.60.173.107 (talk) 07:16, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep or merge to programmable logic controller. With just a few minutes searching, I was able to add three sources that had listed and modestly discussed PLC manufacturers. So I think there is sourcing to sufficient to help establish who goes on this list and if we restrict to notable entries, this becomes a reasonable standalone list. Another alternative to deletion would be to merge this list into programmable logic controller at the end of the article. In any case, I don't see a compelling policy-based reason to delete this content. --{{u|Mark viking}} {Talk} 09:45, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to programmable logic controller as an WP:ATD. I think both articles would be improved from a merge, this is an unnecessary fork/split.   // Timothy :: talk  14:07, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge useful content and redirect. No reason to pour content down the drain. jp×g 12:32, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.