Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Little Elliott Lloyd

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SOFTDELETE j⚛e decker^talk 19:22, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Little Elliott Lloyd (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This person doesn't seem notable enough for his own article. Considering he released only one album with his band, which in itself isn't notable and I don't know how notable the album is, and when Googling his name, I only got 2 pages of results, with most if not all results don't seem like reliable sources. Pyrotle…the "y" is silent, BTW. 01:57, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cutting your own album in and of itself doesn't make a musician notable. Many notable musicians were either studio musicians or part of a band but are still wiki worthy. IE certain (all?) members of Kiss, John Bonham, ... Postcard Cathy (talk)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:55, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:55, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.