Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LiveProcess (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete (G11). (non-admin closure) AllyD (talk) 07:19, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

LiveProcess

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional. No external references Rathfelder (talk) 18:17, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 20:00, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: An article regarding which the 2006 AfD made plain the editing involvement of people associated with the company, and where subsequent editing by other accounts has added plainly promotional text ("earned the trust", "achieving an unprecedented level", "we listened", etc.): there should be Connected Contributor declarations on the Talk page but isn't. The promotional text could be pruned by normal editing, of course, but what then would be left beyond a basic statement that the company is in business? My own searches are locating a stream of routine announcements, but that is simply as befits any company that is doing business. I am not seeing anything to indicate encyclopaedic notability. AllyD (talk) 20:10, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:45, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:45, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: One of those terrible "Keep because it's important" decisions so common with AfDs ten years ago, I'm seeing nothing myself save for routine casual mentions. Ravenswing 23:33, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.