Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loïc Lambour
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Nakon 00:41, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
Loïc Lambour
- Loïc Lambour (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG. References don't prove any notability, but some merely link to photo galleries. And the awards are no more notable than winning a Commons photo challenge. Conflict of interest issues as well, so this is really a self-promotional article. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:34, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete: Per everything nom. said. I've tagged the article for notability and CoI. ― Padenton|✉ 17:18, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. ― Padenton|✉ 17:18, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. ― Padenton|✉ 17:19, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. ― Padenton|✉ 17:20, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete misses the mark for notability, search pulls up artists work but not secondaries about the artist. WikiBios yes Wikipedia no. Bryce Carmony (talk) 17:28, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. As per others above. Also, no indication of notability anywhere in the article prose. And the referenced sources themselves seem non-notable (except for the Républicain Lorrain which is a minor newspaper).--A bit iffy (talk) 17:45, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:36, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.