Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 September 9

Purge server cache

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:18, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kim Jong-chol (footballer, born 1991)

Kim Jong-chol (footballer, born 1991) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 (talk) 23:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:18, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kim Il-yong

Kim Il-yong (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 (talk) 23:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Cameroon–Russia relations. Liz Read! Talk! 23:25, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Embassy of Cameroon, Moscow

Embassy of Cameroon, Moscow (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article merely confirms its address. Does not meet WP:ORG. LibStar (talk) 23:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 06:52, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Habben Michael

Habben Michael (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The page is a mixture of unsourced BLP information and promotion. It was created in 2013 by an editor who only edited subjects linked to Teriy Keys/Smurfie Syco and was eventually blocked for a legal threat. I have searched online and not found any reliable sources: the online sources in the article are mostly dead. TSventon (talk) 16:18, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bearian is/was she a singer? That is not mentioned in the article. Did you find any independent sources? I have looked again at the sources: three are not independent, the archived copy of the "Europa Star" article does not mention her, which leaves New York (magazine), which is inaccessible and not enough on its own. Oddly the article history shows the author trying to delete the article in 2015 due to "request from persons legal team" before being blocked for a legal threat. TSventon (talk) 11:30, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If I chime in early in the AfD process, and it’s not a clear delete, and I’ve done at least some due diligence, then I usually just comment and ask questions. Let me think about this one. Bearian (talk) 11:54, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Continuing with my online searches, which I’m sure you have already done, I see that she has an album on sale at Amazon, Spotify, Pandora, and other websites; she also has videos on YouTube. She registered her company, ROAD, in the UK. That’s about it; pages of Google hits are not reliable sources. I’m leaning now towards delete for lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. Bearian (talk) 14:15, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:21, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: I do see various streaming sites, but nothing related to modelling. I don't see any kind of reliable sourcing we can use for an article. I'm not even sure the sources now in the article are helpful... Oaktree b (talk) 23:52, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to 2024 World Series of Poker. as an ATD. The proposed Merge target article now exists as a Redirect due to its own AFD so this is the suggestion that still is viable. Liz Read! Talk! 00:33, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Park (poker player)

Peter Park (poker player) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person, no WP:SIGCOV. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 17:31, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

More sources added + revised. PsychoticIncall (talk) 14:03, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to consider Merge possibility.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:19, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What I propose is the creation of a new article which covers the $10K version of the tournament listed in the article about Funaro but also who subsections the lower buy-in version of the tournament in this article. This is if the $10K buy-in event is deemed notable as the new article will essentially be about that tournament. PsychoticIncall (talk) 09:32, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to 2024 World Series of Poker. Liz Read! Talk! 06:56, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Frank Funaro (poker player)

Frank Funaro (poker player) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person, lacking WP:SIGCOV outside specialist poker websites. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 17:36, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:18, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to TV JOJ. ✗plicit 00:37, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

JOJ WAU

JOJ WAU (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Probably not notable. I could only find this: [1], [2], [3]. This probably does not constitute significant coverage. Janhrach (talk) 17:27, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I am not sure about the merits of the proposed redirect as the article lists that target page (TV JOJ) as the sister station to this one. Any additional thoughts?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malinaccier (talk) 19:11, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:13, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 22:30, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SEFF Binghamton: Student Experimental Film Festival in Binghamton

SEFF Binghamton: Student Experimental Film Festival in Binghamton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Student film festival that doesn't appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:EVENTCRIT. The only coverage I can find comes from student newspapers or non-independent sources. Orphaned for over a decade, not a likely search term. hinnk (talk) 22:25, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:13, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 11:07, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

South Africa women's national under-18 softball team

South Africa women's national under-18 softball team (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No independent, third party coverage uncovered for this subject to meet the WP:NTEAM or WP:GNG. The only sources in the article now are primary. Let'srun (talk) 23:50, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Already at AFD (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Singapore women's junior national softball team) so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:58, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Chamillionaire#2008–2010: Final Mixtape Messiah, Venom, and Major Pain. Liz Read! Talk! 22:36, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Main Event (Chamillionaire song)

The Main Event (Chamillionaire song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources are to non third-party sources or places where the song is available for streaming. Never charted, cannot find sources, fails WP:NMUSIC Roasted (talk) 22:26, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Chamillionaire#2008–2010: Final Mixtape Messiah, Venom, and Major Pain per nomination. Found no additional coverage/notability myself. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 01:19, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz Read! Talk! 22:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2015–16 Hapoel Tel Aviv F.C. season

2015–16 Hapoel Tel Aviv F.C. season (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article without any type of notoriety or references Alon9393 (talk) 21:34, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:39, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Irakli Bagration-Imeretinsky

Irakli Bagration-Imeretinsky (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I think it’s now pretty well established at AfD that we don’t keep articles on members of pretend monarchies that haven’t existed for centuries. Mccapra (talk) 21:52, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify‎. Liz Read! Talk! 22:41, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2015–16 Maccabi Petah Tikva F.C. season

2015–16 Maccabi Petah Tikva F.C. season (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

In the intro he talks about a football team then it becomes empty and irrelevant Alon9393 (talk) 21:04, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to American Football Ireland#Defunct teams. Owen× ☎ 21:10, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Belfast Bulls

Belfast Bulls (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that this meets WP:NSPORTS / WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 20:42, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Owen× ☎ 21:10, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CAF Cepia

CAF Cepia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per discussion on the talk page (Talk:CAF Cepia), editors have asserted that the existence of a CAF Cepia or CAF Sepia model is not verifiable as of when this article was created in April of 2020. Searching online, I was only able to find a single Russian publication referring to a model by this name ([4]), and it dates to 2 years later in addition to otherwise being of unclear reliability and leaving some uncertainty as to the "correct" spelling given the high likelihood of confusion when transliterating s, c, r and p between Cyrillic, Latin and Turkish. Available evidence would appear to suggest that, irrespective of whether Turkish State Railways has bought trains manufactured by CAF, none of them are known as Sepia or Cepia and thus there should be neither a redirect nor an article at this title. A WP:BLAR was essentially challenged at an RfD discussion, with that discussion recommending it be sent to AfD. signed, Rosguill talk 20:05, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 22:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dorell Anthony

Dorell Anthony (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD, article about a non-notable actor and filmmaker. Don't it satisfies criteria for WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG, possible WP:COI. Jamiebuba (talk) 20:04, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 19:13, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. The views supporting keeping the page are more persuasive and well-argued, and outweigh those suggesting deletion. (non-admin closure) The editing spirit (talk) 18:11, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Linxea

Linxea (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unlikely to be notable: its a brokerage, that is only relevant in France, and doesn't make any claims for notability. Sadads (talk) 20:04, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 19:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 07:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Resoomer

Resoomer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Has heavy coverage in industry press release type venues, but doesn't make a case for lasting notability, looks like SEO or COI editing. Sadads (talk) 20:09, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 19:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment I'll show my bias here, but this article, and others by the same editor, have plenty of sources in French (and some in Spanish) but I find none in English. I know that in en.wp we are not limited to English language sources, but if a topic has no relevance to an English-speaking audience then I do not see the *informational* value in including it. (I understand the desire on the part of businesses to get into en.wp but I'm not terribly sympathetic to that motive.) Using the logic of this article, we would import every article from every wiki into en.wp, but I don't think that provides the best service to en.wp users. I also agree about the possible COI but have no idea what to do about it. Lamona (talk) 02:40, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Like Lamona, I don't see the encyclopedic value here. If this had gone through AfC I suspect the reviewer would have declined it as promo. I think we should just delete it. -- asilvering (talk) 04:12, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 23:30, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nutan (Nepalese actor)

Previous AfDs for this article:
Nutan (Nepalese actor) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deleted in January as Nutan (actor). Still doesn't seem to meet WP:NACTOR. jlwoodwa (talk) 19:23, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As the person who accepted this article, initially I thought he might meet the general notability guideline, but now looking back, yeah, he doesn't. Delete. OhHaiMark (talk) 12:29, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Search about him on Google, YouTube and other websites. I think he meets the general notability guideline. Most of his articles are in Nepalese language, so you might be thinking that way. Thanks! 111.119.49.66 (talk) 14:17, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for soft deletion, so relisting to come to clearer consensus to delete the article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malinaccier (talk) 20:35, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 19:00, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Owen× ☎ 20:59, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Klaus Boesch

Klaus Boesch (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:NARTIST. No indication of significance. Promo puff piece article. scope_creepTalk 18:39, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists and Austria. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:59, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Dear WcQuiddith! Could you help me? What is wrong with the topics 'Artist' and 'Austria'? Klaus Boesch is an Austrian citizen and he is an artist, being successful in the asian and ME region mainly. Which does not make his artworks any worse than works of artists who are renowned in the US. The English Wikipedia should carry international measurements, because English is the language many Wiki users look up if they can't find anyting in their own language. Rich KB (talk) 12:40, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Nothing for this artist, no listing in the Getty ULAN [6], there is a motorboat company and an athlete with the same name. Oaktree b (talk) 23:59, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Here [7] or [8], neither of which seem to be about this person. Oaktree b (talk) 00:00, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry Oaktree, I have read the in the Getty ULAN website, it is a historical database. But Klaus Boesch is a still alive artist. You might find his profile on Artmajeur.com in example. I find it interesting, that Wikipedia seems not to allow establishing novelties. Sandman is not in the Getty database, because Klaus Boesch has not achieved major success in USA. Also let me add, that the English Wikipedia should be open for a world-wide community and not be snippeted to American measurements only! Klaus Boesch's success happens in Japan and China. If it is important for you to be listed in the Getty ULAN - could you let me know how an artist can be listed there?
    The motorboat company from Switzerland and the athlete have nothing to do with Klaus Boesch. Rich KB (talk) 12:35, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I couldn't find anything either. scope_creepTalk 13:55, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Dear all! Once again: my success is in ME, China and Japan. That's why you can't find me in the Getty ULAN and you can't find anything relevant online in the English world or particularly in the USA about Klaus Boesch.
I talked to a moderator I know and he said, I might upload information from non-commercial media and eventually mention the Beijing Design Week.
Unfortunately the lady who had been creating my article on Wiki just gave birth to her first baby and she is off duty therefore. So my question is: who can help me inserting some of that content to get a better proof for my live as an artist. If you can help me, I would appreciate. Klaus Boesch Rich KB (talk) 15:07, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - based on the source analysis by WomenArtistUpdates and an online BEFORE search. This promotionally toned autobiography is of an artist who does not meet WP's notability criteria for artists per WP:NARTIST, WP:GNG and WP:BASIC. Klaus (Rich KB), Wikipedia strongly discourages autobiographies because it's nearly impossible for a person to have a completely neutral, objective point of view about one's own self-importance, or as you put it, "success". Fame and success are not the same as encyclopedic notability on WP. This is not a reflection on you or your work, it's simply how the encyclopedia works. I suggest that you set up a personal artist website to promote your work. Netherzone (talk) 02:17, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Visual arts and Japan. Netherzone (talk) 03:42, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Dear Netherzone! WomenArtistUpdates just states 'no reliable sourcing'. Can we call that an analysis? It is just a vague statement not more, not less. It is correct that my team does not have a completely neutral and objective view. If the fame of my works is happening in language zones, which you cannot reach, because it is Chinese, Japanese or Arabic - does that justify your conclusions? If an artist is not renowned for his works in English language - is there no place in Wikipedia for such an artist? I had the impression, Wikipedia is a worldwide source without any language limits. But you guys proof different. It seems that your information is just based on what you can find in the English spoken internet. I know I should keep being polite, but sorry, this is a quite poor attitude and also a narrow minded world Wikipedia is reflecting. I have not heared any helpful hints or ideas of how I could improve my article in a way you would accept it. So - can we expect any help from your side? I would appreciate help a lot. Rich KB (talk) 16:19, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Owen× ☎ 20:55, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Constantine Spandagos

Constantine Spandagos (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPROF. scope_creepTalk 18:30, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Engineering, Environment, Greece, England, and New Hampshire. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:01, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete early-career academic with citation counts not yet at the level needed for WP:PROF#C1. The article cites some mainstream media coverage of research he participated in (in the South China Morning Post and Irish Times) but his part in that work was apparently minor enough that he is not even name-dropped in those articles or in anything at all in Google News. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:04, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    All the mainstream media articles cited in this article are dedicated to research for which the academic had the leading role. There is no reference to research he simply participated in. The ScienceTrends article is fully dedicated to the academic's PhD thesis, and his name is mentioned in the article. The GreenQueen article is fully dedicated to a research paper of which the academic is the lead author, and his name is mentioned as well. The research covered in South China Morning Post also concerns a paper of which the academic is the lead author. His name is mentioned there too, and it seems that he had been invited to speak to the reporter/author of the article as an recognized expert in his field, as some of his quotes are used directly in the article. The only media article cited in this Wikipedia page that does not mention the academic's name directly is the Irish Times one. However, even that article is fully dedicated to a research paper to which the academic is the lead author. Therefore, no media source cited in this Wikipedia article covers work where the academic's part was minor.
    In terms of notability, I personally find it important that the academic's work is mentioned on these media articles, because these articles all come from independent sources. It doesn't seem that any of these sources belong to any of the organizations the academic has/had any affiliation with (unless I am wrong). For me, this shows that somebody's research work has impact and notability. Also, all these media are considered mainstream (I contrast this to other Wikipedia articles about academics, which cite various media covering the academics' work, but these media are often part of the university the academics are working in). Perhaps GreenQueen is the least known medium in countries outside Asia, but it is one of the most visited sustainability media in Asia, with 20+ million monthly digital impressions. Wikiuser852 (talk) 07:58, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Notability not remotely attained. Why on earth was this premature BLP created? Xxanthippe (talk) 00:24, 10 September 2024 (UTC).[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Complex/Rational 19:14, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dara Greaney

Dara Greaney (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:GNG. Cited sources routinely mention him as CEO, but none of them go in detail and mostly are about the company, BuyAutoParts.com. Gheus (talk) 18:22, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Complex/Rational 19:14, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Randall Rossilli Jr.

Randall Rossilli Jr. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The claim of notability as a media entrepreneur is weak and lacks the in-depth reliable and verifiable sources required to back up the claim. Recording songs for release on iTunes is an even weaker claim of notability, not does his work as a teacher reach any notability standard. I was unable to find any meaningful in-depth coverage for him in a Google search. Alansohn (talk) 18:18, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Owen× ☎ 20:54, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Zahrisaurus

AfDs for this article:
Zahrisaurus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Yet another Malkani dinosaur. References are exclusively predatory journals. This is not a real dinosaur, or even a notable fake one. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 17:59, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I notice it was previously "soft" deleted, potentially making this eligible for WP:CSD#G4? Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 18:00, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. (non-admin closure) Xegma(talk) 13:32, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

River Lyvennet

River Lyvennet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of sources. Xegma(talk) 17:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. asilvering (talk) 17:52, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Adebayo Adeleke

Adebayo Adeleke (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:BIO. Refs are primary on a WP:BLP made up of interviews, profiles, podcasts. No indication of significance. scope_creepTalk 17:37, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No. Its doesn't add nothing. Its not an elected postion, you just send in your money and your a member. Now, if it was something like a Fellow of the Royal Society, that would be completely different. scope_creepTalk 11:21, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Content can be Merged, I suggest proposing this editing decision on the article talk page. Liz Read! Talk! 23:33, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Theory of Interstellar Trade

The Theory of Interstellar Trade (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nonnotable speculative article; the sole sources about are the author and a single commentary in a blog. The author himself confesses that it was a tongue-in-cheek endeavor. --Altenmann >talk 17:02, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep. I dunno, it's been cited 65 times, which seems high for a tongue-in-cheek joke article! It's been discussed quite a lot in books as well, in addition to Tyler Cowen's commentary that's already in the article. I think it's arguable that this article could be treated as notable under WP:BKCRIT #5, with an author "so historically significant that any of the author's written works may be considered notable. This does not simply mean that the book's author is notable by Wikipedia's standards; rather, the book's author is of exceptional significance and the author's life and body of written work would be a common subject of academic study." I could be convinced to redirect, since it's likely a valid search term, but I'm on keep for now. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:34, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – I've found some decent coverage. In rough order of significance:
jlwoodwa (talk) 18:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn; speedy keep‎. Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:32, 9 September 2024 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

Address to the Nation

Address to the Nation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is WP:SYNTH and thus fails WP:GNG by violating WP:NOR. The article cites no source describing the concept of an "address to the nation" or "national address" as a global phenomenon; instead, it describes specific examples in particular countries (relying primarily on WP:PRIMARYSOURCES) and strings them together in what is definitionally original research. Dclemens1971 (talk) 16:56, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep – I agree that we don't need an article about the topic of national addresses, but I think it could be converted to a reasonable list of national addresses. jlwoodwa (talk) 18:23, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's a reasonable outcome. I'll withdraw and move the article. Keep. Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:31, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:14, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cullen Sheehan

Cullen Sheehan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a lobbyist, not properly referenced as passing inclusion criteria for lobbyists. The attempted notability claim here is that he had political consultancy roles, like campaign manager or chief of staff, before registering as a lobbyist, but those are completely unsourced for the purposes of turning them into notability claims, while his work as a lobbyist is referenced entirely to a single directory entry that isn't support for notability. Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to pass WP:GNG on third-party reliable source coverage in media about him and his work. Bearcat (talk) 14:14, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide sources to support notability Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:01, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:08, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

James P. Covey

James P. Covey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a diplomat and politician, not properly referenced as passing inclusion criteria for diplomats or politicians. The attempted notability claim here is that he was nominated for a subcabinet position but was never confirmed into the role by the senate, which is not "inherently" notable in and of itself -- the notability bar at WP:NPOL is holding a notable office, not just being nominated for one -- but the article says absolutely nothing else about his career up to that point to suggest any other basis for preexisting notability, and it's referenced 2/3 to primary sources that are not support for notability at all. And while there is one reliable source to a piece of media coverage, one of those isn't enough all by itself. Bearcat (talk) 14:02, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note This editor has since been blocked for vandalism. Best, GPL93 (talk) 19:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 13:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jean Bernard Djambou

Jean Bernard Djambou (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minor Olympian with virtually no source coverage. Allan Nonymous (talk) 13:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 00:29, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Friends Communication

Friends Communication (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I cannot find sufficient reliable news coverage independent of the topic here, per WP:CORP Loewstisch (talk) 10:39, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malinaccier (talk) 13:26, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, I couldn't find any significant coverage in reliable sources, English or Bengali (ফ্রেন্ডস কমিউনিকেশন), just passing mentions in articles about their films. The same is true of the sources cited, it's WP:REFBOMB'd with 96 citations about the films, but just 13 of them actually make passing mention of the company, literally "produced by Friends Communication" in each case. Wikishovel (talk) 10:06, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 12:50, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oladipupo Olayinka

Oladipupo Olayinka (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't find any other sources talking about him. Only WP:PASSINGMENTION Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 12:50, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 12:46, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rick Brook

Rick Brook (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. The only RS coverage is run of the mill high school sports coverage in local news outlets. Being " most successful boys basketball coach in the history of Sebring McKinley High School" certainly does not establish notability. GPL93 (talk) 12:28, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think any of them are notability-lending. One is the high school he attended, the high school where he coached, and one specific to Ohio high school basketball coaches by the Ohio basketball coaches association. Both high schools appear to have had and still have rather low enrollments. Best, GPL93 (talk) 16:20, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 11:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gurukripa Career Institute

Gurukripa Career Institute (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The institute is a coaching centre for the preparation of competitive exams, not an government approved educational establishment. It does not meet WP:NSCHOOL. See WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Also several new SPAs are engaged in suspicious editing this page. They have even tried to manipulate the List of institutions of higher education in Rajasthan by creating a new section for "Coaching institutes" and adding this coaching centre, which is not an appropriate category. Charlie (talk) 11:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

:*Keep: Yes, there was some promotional content in this article, but I believe deletion is not the solution. I have visited this institute, and many others visit it as well. However, there is no proper source that provides accurate information about this institute. Therefore, I think we should add correct and reliable information instead of deleting it. This way, it will help people find the right information about the institute, which has a large number of students. Every year, many students try to get information about this institute, but they struggle to find reliable and proper sources.

Sandeep Kumar Kajla (talk) 12:20, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Account blocked for abusing multiple accounts. PhilKnight (talk) 15:58, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If the students can't find any sources, and you can't find sources, that indicates this isn't a notable institution. Oaktree b (talk) 15:26, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

:* Keep : I think we should keep this article as it will reflect the truth of coaching industry.

Mike20008 (talk) 12:22, 9 September 2024 (UTC))Account blocked for abusing multiple accounts. PhilKnight (talk) 15:58, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

:* Keep: Deletion is not in order here. The article provides a good beginning for information on a major institute. With an update using credible and accurate data, we can do much better to serve the needs of interested individuals. Semsuineas.wiki (talk) 12:34, 9 September 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Charlie, I think you've read the List of Institutions of Higher Education in Rajasthan properly. At the top, some private engineering colleges are mentioned, and their pages have also been published. Therefore, I don't believe we can't add private institutes.
Mike20008 (talk) 12:43, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Account blocked for abusing multiple accounts. PhilKnight (talk) 15:58, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

:* Keep: Removing the article is not a solution. The institute is very important to a lot of students. By re-writing with known and verified information, we could offer a valuable page to those looking for correct information.

Maggidi (talk) 13:14, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Account blocked for abusing multiple accounts. PhilKnight (talk) 15:58, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

:@CharlieMehta, I do not want to get caught in this controversy but would like to say one thing that instead of deleting, everyone should try to improve, because even today there are many articles which are not correct and the recent information is also not updated, so more focus should be kept on improving. Let's all decide together whether to keep it or not @Maggidi, @Mike20008, @Paul W, @Semsuineas.wiki, @Skajlajjn1996, @Timtrent

Thanks Devidafrica.villager (talk) 14:20, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Account blocked for abusing multiple accounts. PhilKnight (talk) 15:58, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 11:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thibault Duplessis

Thibault Duplessis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO, WP:SIGCOV. No indication of signification found in the before. scope_creepTalk 11:01, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. ✗plicit 11:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edie Rodriguez

Edie Rodriguez (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable business woman. Article has been an orphan for 7 years, sources are all trade press puff. Golikom (talk) 10:28, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. The subject passes Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Basic criteria, which says:

    Sources

    1. Golden, Fran (2015-01-15). "Cruise Exec Spotlight: Edie Rodriguez". Porthole Cruise Magazine. Archived from the original on 2024-09-10. Retrieved 2024-09-10.

      The article notes: "Edie Rodriguez (née Edie Bornstein), president and chief operating office of Los Angeles–based luxury line Crystal Cruises, is a 53-year-old Type-A personality who sleeps four hours a night, likes fast cars, and never met a Neiman Marcus she didn’t like. And she’s obsessed — with Rod Stewart. ... Travel got into her soul as a child growing up in New York, when she decided her quest was to see the world. But there was the slight issue that she had no money, she laughs. So she went to work as a travel consultant, relocated to…"

    2. Sampson, Hannah (2013-10-05). "Edie Bornstein to lead Crystal Cruises". Miami Herald. Archived from the original on 2024-09-10. Retrieved 2024-09-10.

      The article notes: "Edie Bornstein, who left Azamara on Sept. 30, will become president and chief operating officer of Los Angeles-based Crystal Cruises effective Oct. 16. She replaces Gregg Michel, whose resignation was announced Friday. Bornstein joined Azamara, the upscale two-ship brand owned by Royal Caribbean Cruises, in 2009. Before that, she was vice president of business development and strategic partnerships at Carnival Cruise Lines and also had stints at Cunard and Seabourn. Before working for cruise lines, she focused on the cruise industry at Amadeus, the global travel technology company."

    3. Herrera, Chabeli (2017-10-20). "You may not know of French line Ponant yet — but a Miami cruise expert plans to change that". Miami Herald. Archived from the original on 2024-09-10. Retrieved 2024-09-10.

      The article notes: "Rodriguez joined Crystal after holding several senior sales, marketing and business development positions at Royal Caribbean Cruises and Carnival Corporation. She served as Crystal's president and chief operating officer from 2013-14 before being promoted to president and CEO in 2015, when the cruise line was acquired by Genting Hong Kong."

    4. Herrera, Chabeli (2017-09-15). "Crystal Cruises' president and CEO Edie Rodriguez resigns". Miami Herald. Archived from the original on 2021-02-12. Retrieved 2024-09-10.

      The article notes: "Since Rodriguez took the helm as president and CEO, Crystal has launched two river vessels, with a third forthcoming, an expedition yacht, and an ultra luxury, private Boeing 777. The three brands, Crystal Yachts, Crystal River Cruises and Crystal Air, have been instrumental in growing Crystal’s footprint in the luxury travel market."

    5. Becken, Bill (Spring–Summer 2014). "The new face of Crystal Cruises". International Cruise & Ferry Review. No. 44. pp. 82–83. ISSN 0957-7696.EBSCOhost 113549718.

      The article notes: "Whether regaling travel agents at an elegant seaside resort in southeast Florida, or holding court for a retinue of luxury travel media aboard the Crystal Serenity on the West Coast in Los Angeles, Edie Bornstein, Crystal Cruises' new president and chief operating officer, is understandably busy. Appointed in October 2013, she previously served as SVP, sales and marketing for Azamara Club Cruises, based in Miami. There is a logical progression from Azamara's upmarket offering with its two, roughly 700-passenger ships, to Crystal's ultra-luxury brand, deploying two ships of around 1,000-passenger capacity. Consequently, even as a presidential newcomer at Crystal, Bornstein exudes the same confident manner and zeal as she was known for in her earlier career."

    6. Snyder, Benjamin (2016-01-21). "Meet the Only Woman to Lead a Luxury Cruise Line". Fortune. Archived from the original on 2024-09-10. Retrieved 2024-09-10.

      The article notes: "For Crystal Cruises CEO Edie Rodriguez, travel isn’t just a hobby—it’s a way of life. In fact, Rodriguez has traveled to nearly 200 countries so far. Chances are, she’s nowhere near finished. Since starting with the luxury cruise line in 2013, the travel industry veteran has been all business. Indeed, she’s been working to transform the line’s culture—and even the way people vacation, as Fortune recently reported. Rodriguez is building out the brand to not only include excursions by sea, but also by river on a yacht and even by airplane. And, as the only female CEO of a luxury cruise line, she’s also blazing a new path in industry where the top ranks are dominated by men. Rodriguez began her career as a travel consultant and has worked for Carnival Corporation, Royal Caribbean Cruises, and Azamara Club Cruises over the years."

    7. Less significant coverage:
      1. Sampson, Hannah (2019-09-21). "Christine Duffy named new Carnival Cruise Line president". Miami Herald. Archived from the original on 2019-09-21. Retrieved 2024-09-10.

        The article notes: "Late last year, Crystal Cruises chose Edie Rodriguez (then Edie Bornstein) as president and chief operating officer"

      2. Vora, Shivani (2015-10-13). "Why Crystal Cruises Is Adding a Plane and Submarine to Its Fleet". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 2024-09-10. Retrieved 2024-09-10.

        The article notes: "Crystal Cruises is on something of a tear. The Los Angeles-based luxury cruise line currently sails to all seven continents on itineraries ranging from five to 128 days, but the chief executive, Edie Rodriguez, 54, recently announced an aggressive expansion plan for its 25th anniversary this year. It started with her commissioning three new vessels to be built for Crystal's core fleet, bringing the total to five. ... Ms. Rodriguez has visited more than 75 countries through cruising."

      3. Kickham, Debbi K. (2014-09-20). "Cruising her way to the top: Edie Rodriguez". The Boston Globe. Archived from the original on 2024-09-10. Retrieved 2024-09-10.

        The article notes: "Edie Rodriguez is a type-A born-and-bred New Yorker and last year was made president and chief operating officer at Crystal Cruises. We checked in with her to see if her business life is all smooth sailing."

    There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Edie Rodriguez to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".

    Cunard (talk) 11:14, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to University of the Philippines Diliman. ✗plicit 11:42, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

University of the Philippines College of Mass Communication

University of the Philippines College of Mass Communication (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP, WP:BRANCH. No indication of significance. scope_creepTalk 10:21, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Article is about a degree-granting unit of the national university of the Philippines. Though I do admit that I haven't been able to flesh out the article yet, it seems hardly accurate to say that it has no indication of significance considering that it's about a part of the larger University of the Philippines Diliman but otherwise wouldn't fit on that page. Brly31415 (talk) 10:40, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 11:41, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Matej Rehák

Matej Rehák (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Rehák played a total of 19 minutes at professional level before being sent to lower leagues, then disappeared. The only secondary source I found is SME but it's paywalled. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 10:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. ✗plicit 11:41, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Technology Connections

AfDs for this article:
Technology Connections (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I still believe this fails SIGCOV and notability for the same reasons discussed in the last AfD discussion two months ago. StewdioMACK (talk) 09:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 11:40, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kashif Aslam

Kashif Aslam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable makeup artist. This was created after the deletion of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kashee's Beauty Salon by the same user. Fails WP:GNG. Gheus (talk) 09:37, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 11:39, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Raihan Merchant

AfDs for this article:
Raihan Merchant (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tamgha-e-Imtiaz is a minor (4th grade) award, according to our article. There is no direct or in-depth coverage about him. Fails WP:GNG. Gheus (talk) 09:33, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

'4th grade' makes it sounds like it isn't a real award at all, whereas it definitely is and only conferred upon high-achievers. It is the 'medal of excellence' after all. Raihan Merchant is actually a super influential figure in Pakistan media and advertising. Sharan Shias (talk) 10:15, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 11:43, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ACM Gold

ACM Gold (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable forex broker. Coverage is mostly paid/PR-based. Fails WP:GNG. Gheus (talk) 09:28, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 11:38, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Irfan Pardesi

Irfan Pardesi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable forex trader. Lacks unpaid independent in-depth secondary sources to pass WP:GNG. Gheus (talk) 09:26, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 07:20, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Andrea Kule

Andrea Kule (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

8 games in Albania’s highest league, continued in the semi-pro second tier, did get 4 more games on the top level. With sources not being better than this, this or this, I don't think it meets WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. What do you think? Geschichte (talk) 08:39, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to List of Telugu films of 2023#October–December. Liz Read! Talk! 07:15, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vidhi (2023 film)

Vidhi (2023 film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Recently 123telugu was declared unreliable by the Indian cinema taskforce. Given that Indiaglitz is also considered unreliable, there are no reliable reviews (had there been at least 1, I would have let this slide). There was a FilmyFocus review on the page but that is also likely non notable (all unreliable sources can't be listed there). Given that the fact that the longest source is an interview from 123telugu, this film has no notability.

The TV9 Telugu source is a small snippet only mentioned that Vishwak Sen was invited for the film's launch while the NTV source mentions where the film is streaming. All in all, the only notable reliable source is the NTV source [15], which isn't enough to keep an entire Wikipedia article of a 2023 film. This isn't even a pre Internet film.

P. S. I had tried my best to improve the film's sourcing to no avail. DareshMohan (talk) 07:25, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 06:59, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Helge Rasche

Helge Rasche (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:FOOTYN as he never played nor coached at top level. Coverage is only of his death, which does not automatically establish notability. 💥Casualty • Hop along. • 06:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Giant can have your say on the relevance of Abdul Hannan (singer).Alon9393 (talk) 18:14, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
WP:CANVASS. GiantSnowman 18:15, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Giant The issue is that no one has an opinion on whether it should be maintained or eliminated, it is abandoned.Alon9393 (talk) 18:18, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Giant - essays such as WP:FOOTYN are not binding; however, they are intrinsically relevant or else they would not exist as essays due to their irrelevance. WP:FOOTYN is merely a yardstick by which to measure the nominated's article for signs of notability, not a directive or guideline, and as such is not as meaningless as you might feel. Ref (chew)(do) 21:18, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, you are totally wrong. FOOTYN is a Project-specific essay which confirms that it is nothing more than a "record of the previous guidance". GiantSnowman 17:09, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete All-know tragic, and having a look at sources on the article and online, I really only see what you call a WP:routine type of coverage on the announcement of his death. What's impressive know is that it is covered fairly globally, I saw sources from, America, Africa, Europe. But it's all the same thing, which is the announcement, I don't see how this is WP:LASTING. Regards. Govvy (talk) 21:23, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Delete, I believe it because of the references generated at the time following his death, I admit that it lacks notoriety and encyclopedic development. Alon9393 (talk) 08:06, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 13:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of Sanskrit authors from lower communities

List of Sanskrit authors from lower communities (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very unclear whether this group of "lower communities" which includes e.g. Sat-Sudra (considered higher castes), is a commonly accepted grouping with a clear definition, or some division created specifically for this article. Also not clear if the topic (Sanskrit texts by caste division) is a topic of study and whether these people are grouped together scholarly, or if this is some novel WP:SYNTH list. Fram (talk) 08:19, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia article of Sat-Sudra is very badly written. I have suggested an edit but my edit is reverted. Please check. Sat-shoodras are only higher than other shudras (asat shudras) and lower than every other varna. That is, Lower than Brahmins, Kshatriyas and Vaishya. See the note on sat-shoodra there. Caste boundaries can't be clearly defined due to their complexities. The main castes are mentioned themselves which are considered lower nonetheless. Sat-shoodra only highlights their status in varna system. This is a dynamic list and more people from other communities can be added by everyone. The topic of debate has always been whether lower communities have contributed to sanskrit among scholars. This article helps in breaking the myths of denial of education and lack of scholarship among lower communities and foster inclusivity. Mohit Dokania (talk) 09:03, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Fails WP:NLIST and WP:RS. Almost 60 % of the sources are unreliable. Andhraportal, wisdomlib, jainqq.org, sanskritkosha,sndp, sanskritdocuments etc., are not RS. A list topic is considered notable if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent, reliable sources, which I find none here. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 10:18, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    All references to Wisdomlib, Jainqq.org and sanskritkosha are of published books available on those sources. Which are both reliable and accurate. All the information provided are as accurate as possible. You can challenge any misinformation in talk page. This has always been the matter of debate among scholars to assess the contribution of lower communuties in Sanskrit literature. See this. Mohit Dokania (talk) 15:36, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:09, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:54, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Rohri–Chaman Line#Stations. Liz Read! Talk! 06:56, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Perak railway station

Perak railway station (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NTRAINSTATION. cyberdog958Talk 06:42, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 06:55, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

North American Grappling Association

North American Grappling Association (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails GNG and NCORP for not having signification coverage from independent, reliable sources for verification. Cassiopeia talk 06:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted‎ under WP:G5 by CactusWriter. (non-admin closure) ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 17:06, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tafsir-e-Zakaria

Tafsir-e-Zakaria (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of significant coverages and unsourced sections. Xegma(talk) 06:37, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:59, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Barren Earth (DC Comics)

Barren Earth (DC Comics) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't find any reliable source talking about it so it clearly fails WP:GNG. The article only cites 1 sources which they repeated twice Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 05:59, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:38, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Ultimate Victory. as an ATD (this is a standard outcome for songs judged to be non-notable). Liz Read! Talk! 06:27, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Evening News (song)

The Evening News (song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Never charted and fails Wikipedia:Notability (music). Roasted (talk) 05:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Ultimate Victory per above + I also found no additional sources/notability. Redirecting a song article to the album it's from is standard, and there aren't any other songs with this name listed at Evening News (disambiguation) so ambiguity is a non-issue. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 17:04, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep‎. Nomination has been withdrawn. Liz Read! Talk! 04:03, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Peace

Robert Peace (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SIGCOV. The book seems to notable but not the individual. Note tag placed on it. Coverage is all for the book. scope_creepTalk 04:29, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 03:11, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

International Communal Studies Association

International Communal Studies Association (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No relevance. Article without notoriety and without independent or reliable sources. Alon9393 (talk) 03:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete promotional and fails NCORP. Traumnovelle (talk) 04:10, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I can't find much coverage of them at all, let along SIGCOV. EytanMelech (talk) 22:29, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 00:39, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cañapa Lake

Cañapa Lake (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only one source, not enough to meet the general notability guideline. And the source does not have the lake as its primary topic and hence is not SIGCOV. Stanley Joseph Wilkins (talk) 04:07, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:21, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to List of Fox Broadcasting Company affiliates (by U.S. state). though, in this case, "Merge" just means adding the station to a list of stations. Liz Read! Talk! 02:45, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WSJP-LD

WSJP-LD (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV, Fox affiliation notwithstanding. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 03:24, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. There is a Merge suggestion but you must provide a link to the preferred target article. Thank you.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:19, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 02:41, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

E-Z Moving

E-Z Moving (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Likely to fail WP:NCORP KH-1 (talk) 02:26, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 02:39, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Embassy of South Korea, Dublin

Embassy of South Korea, Dublin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article based on primary sources, fails WP:ORG LibStar (talk) 02:23, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I searched in the Korean language and none of what I read passes the threshold of notability. These are the closest I could find: [16][17] seefooddiet (talk) 09:13, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 02:39, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Logan Taggart

Logan Taggart (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not pass WP:GNG or WP:SIGCOV. He was a member of the town board of a town with a population of 862. Grahaml35 (talk) 02:17, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Population of a town should not be a factor. He deserves notoriety for being the youngest politician in Colorado history. Bobsmithian (talk) 06:25, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
According to Wiki there is basis to keep the article as it does meet standards as I created the article with enough legitimate citations showing he received tens of thousands of votes, spoke on live television and radio and holds a record in politics. @Grahaml35 @CAPTAIN RAJU. I want to make sure there is no political bias in this decision process. Bobsmithian (talk) 06:34, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello - just because an individual has been on television or radio does not automatically qualify them as being notable for a Wiki article. I only mentioned the town size as a bit of information nothing more. The sources on the article and what I could find online are mostly passing mentions and lacks SIGCOV Grahaml35 (talk) 12:43, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There is not political bias, as this person isn't in office and editors aren't all in the US regardless. Oaktree b (talk) 15:39, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails WP:NPOLITICIAN. Based on the creator's contributions, I also strongly suspect this is a paid-for article. I have requested they declare any COI. Number 57 15:21, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I have never been paid for my articles and I have never asked to be. @Number 57 Bobsmithian (talk) 05:37, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Small town politician, being the youngest in the state... Might be notable, but coverage is all PR items or "what is the politician" doing articles, which are not helpful. I don't find coverage, other than talking his high school/college choices. Oaktree b (talk) 15:39, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. A person's age at first election is not an "inherent" notability freebie in and of itself — every single political body that exists at all will always have its own youngest-ever member, so that would simply create instant notability freebies for thousands upon millions of people of no national or international significance. So the notability test for people at the town or city level of governments requires a significant volume of coverage that's specifically about them and their work, enabling us to write a substantive article about their political impact — but that's not what's here, and most of the sourcing glancingly namechecks his existence as a participant in events without being about him in any meaningful or WP:GNG-building sense. Bearcat (talk) 15:03, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to Ireland–Poland relations#Resident diplomatic missions. Liz Read! Talk! 02:34, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Embassy of Poland, Dublin

Embassy of Poland, Dublin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Marked for notability concerns since December 2020. The only sources provided is its own website. Fails WP:ORG. LibStar (talk) 02:10, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion.

A closer's aside: I realize that the sources are inadequate but it still hurts a bit to delete articles that have survived on the project for 20 years. I know that longevity is not a consideration in establishing notability of an article subject but, man, this article has survived a long time before being considered for deletion. I think some of our editors weren't even alive in 2004. Liz Read! Talk! 01:45, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Shevchuk

Jason Shevchuk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Name gets mentioned a lot in punk zines, but as far as I'm aware, none of those are considered reliable, and he's not mentioned frequently enough outside of them to pass notability. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 01:54, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. In this discussion, it was editors who were arguing for Deletion that had arguments based in Wikipedia policy. Most editors who were arguing to Keep this article asserted that the subject was important but we don't base claims in editors' opinion but in reliable sources and the sources brought to the discussion were rejected for a variety of reasons. One editor proposed submitting an article on this subject in the Italian Wikipedia and then, once accepted, translating it for the English Wikipedia. But please know if you wish to pursue this option, please put your translation in Draft space and submit it for review to WP:AFC. If you put it directly into the main space, it could be deleted via speedy deletion as a CSD G4. If you have questions about this, I encourage you to bring them to the Teahouse. Liz Read! Talk! 01:25, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fabio Mancini

AfDs for this article:
Fabio Mancini (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This biography fails WP:GNG as it lacks WP:SUSTAINED direct and in-depth coverage. Gheus (talk) 01:27, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Moved from talkpage by Polygnotus (talk) 22:14, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • fabio mancini is an internationally renowned model and his experience in my opinion deserves to be spread. he is a boy with values ​​who can be an example for the new generations. the page could be corrected without deleting it. what do you think? Iolanda.chinellato (talk) 22:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)— Iolanda.chinellato (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
  • Keep/correct: I totally agree with you @Iolanda.chinellato We can help the community here to get a better page, because have no sense delete a page of a supermodel who everyone know in Italy and in the international fashion world. Make no sense. With the right article (I dont think he need 200 articles to prove is notoriety,just a few to have a good page, maybe little, but with the right informations will works). 88.45.185.68 (talk) 10:52, 10 September 2024 (UTC)— 88.45.185.68 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
  • Delete fails WP:SUSTAINED and WP:ANYBIO; WP:SALTING is very much an option at this stage. SerialNumber54129 13:35, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Insufficient WP:DEPTH of coverage from reliable sources. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:31, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per GNG and WP:ANYBIO. If we're supposed to believe this is an "icon" who everyone in Italy knows, there would be at least an article on the Italian Wikipedia with some solid sources backing up those claims. Never a good sign when the socks come out in force like this. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 05:19, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Maybe because the page was created in a promotional way and not in the wiki rules? What about the other 15 Pages translated? All the people are crazy then? And what about the 500.000 more pictures in Google? AI, Fantasy or maybe he is very important in the fashion business? 109.52.151.75 (talk) 12:08, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Hi everyone, I saw the Fabio Mancini (modello) page history, can someone here explain me why the italian version of Wikipedia mantain his italian page for more than 10 years before someone vandalize like the english version were talking in this topic? Maybe someone, dont want have him here without reason? maybe? Just a suppose. Waiting to your response , thank you 151.53.242.49 (talk) 16:49, 13 September 2024 (UTC)— 151.53.242.49 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
  • Delete I have seen many social media mentions (tiktok, lots of blogs and "fan" type web pages) but no serious sources. The best I got were some Aussie "news" stories connecting him to a gay relationship. If someone can find substantial articles in Italian newspapers or journals I will reconsider. I find the Italian sources to be all behind impenetrable paywalls. Lamona (talk) 04:58, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep and consider Dear @Lamona I find a lot of english sources and a lot of italian articles in the major online italian website and newspaper. We’re can I attached them to show you? I can try to add them in his wiki english sources or here? Because when I tried to write some link attached, I cant send the message here. Why we dont considerate all to create a wiki but I cannot understand why nobody one here ( admin in first who can help, create a wiki italian version - he was online for 10 y ) tried to clean and put in order the english one in our topic.
    just a consideration, NOBODY ONE pay me for my opinion ( i say in his wiki page the suggestion who talk about payments ) 2A02:B121:8012:3C0C:8847:A9D3:6326:2607 (talk) 07:07, 14 September 2024 (UTC)— 2A02:B121:8012:3C0C:8847:A9D3:6326:2607 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
I don't know what the problem is for linking here, but you just copy the URL and paste it in your comment. Lamona (talk) 03:36, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To make it easier to discuss these sources I've turned them into a numbered list:

  1. thefashionisto - 3 sentences
  2. forbes - a skincare ad where he is namedropped
  3. americadomani - 3 sentences in a listicle
  4. womanaroundtown - interview
  5. fashionela - interview
  6. wienermodels - some photos and measurements
  7. imago-images - 1 sentence and a photo you can buy a license for
  8. rizzolilibri - 3 sentences about him as a writer
  9. friendsofeurope - Click the plus icon for a description on a list of so-called "European Young Leaders" made by a weird thinktank, see Friends of Europe

Polygnotus (talk) 09:02, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Find other 3:[37][38][39](num.38 on the european Young leaders profile) LuciaS23 (talk) 09:28, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ad, ad, comment on F of E below. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 11:40, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@PolygnotusThank you for your faster reply, but you all asked me to find some prove and sources to certificate what I said, and I find it. About Friends of Europe, ‘call’ them ‘weird’ when they nominate by year the major personalities in Europe included: First Deputy Minister for Foreign Affairs of various European Nations, various of the best european engineer, physicists & neuroscientist, Astronaut at the European Space Agency, major of the best sport personalities and in this case a supermodel, is not very fair. You can check it all the personalities in. LuciaS23 (talk) 10:43, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My view on this list:
  1. thefashionisto - No WP:SIGCOV and looks like paid content.
  2. forbes - WP:FORBESCON and not even close to WP:GNG.
  3. americadomani - Doesn't look that bad, if this is a WP:RS it helps. I have no idea if it is.
  4. womanaroundtown - A little non Q&A content (WP:INTERVIEW), but looks like a WP:BLOG.
  5. fashionela - Ditto, possibly not as blog-ish
  6. wienermodels - not independent, might have WP:ABOUTSELF use, but no help for this discussion
  7. imago-images - webshop, doesn't help
  8. rizzolilibri - His publisher. Not independent, might have WP:ABOUTSELF use, but no help for this discussion
  9. friendsofeurope - Well, the WP-article Friends of Europe sucks. They are mentioned here:[40]. Not obviously helpful.
Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 11:30, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe, but big personalities are in there always.
anyway here other additional new sources find it on web [41] on Giorgio Armani Official Youtube channel,[42] on Vogue LuciaS23 (talk) 12:59, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
+ [43] with various fashion article (8/9 inside the link) LuciaS23 (talk) 13:02, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I've looked at the articles listed above and unfortunately not one meets the requirements that sources be reliable and substantial. What I see are short promotional paragraphs in fashion-oriented sources, interviews, and photo montages. None of these indicate notability as we define it in en.wikipedia. I suggest searching in mainstream newspapers and magazines. For example, I found this in Corriere della Sera. Unfortunately it is an interview, which means that they are his words about himself, not someone else speaking or writing about him. Also, a good source shows that the writer has done some research on the subject. Most of the web sites proposed mainly re-hash the same few facts (born in Germany, got started by chance, etc.). Even in the interviews there is much repetition. Note also that this person is young and may become more notable in the future, at which time an article would be warranted. Lamona (talk) 20:09, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Suggestion Dear @Lamona Thank you for your kind reply and consideration under our discussion about sources. If you are taking about English sources maybe you got it, (but there are many Pages of people not famous like him without a lot of source in wiki, and for his history its impossibile do not reconize him for the long works with Giorgio Armani(international adv on billboard in our city & tv commercial/and catwalk[44]for many many years - maybe he dont have many articles because is very private person and different then other models? I Guess if you see him on socials) but if you talk about italian sources on the italian Google, he have many many articles (not only interviews) about his amazing career and what is doing now with his humanitarian european school project where is nominate soon to became an ambassador of the new generation by the italian Parliament[45](source by italiano School/ministery of Education). He has written a book too with one of the major book company, and is not possible to see is notoriety, for my opinion. Why we dont creat all an italian version(where he had a lot of more stronger sources)and then traslate in English or complete the English one? Mine personal suggestion, simply opinion
    LuciaS23 (talk) 21:29, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Few more sources: la Repubblica, and two Vanity Fair articles from 2019 and 2021.--Alienautic (talk) 23:56, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 00:25, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Johan Ghazali

Johan Ghazali (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails GNG for not having significant coverage from independent, reliable source for verification. One Champion is not reliable and indepdent source as this is the combat promotion company where the subject is under contract. www.iloveborneo, www.iluminasi and https://www.sportskeeda all are not reliable sources. Cassiopeia talk 00:47, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 00:24, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Crabtree Brewing Co.

Crabtree Brewing Co. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CORP. The first source is a blog. 2nd is not sigcov and third is very local coverage as per WP:AUD. LibStar (talk) 00:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Editors can choose to make a Redirect from this page title on their own as an editing decision. Liz Read! Talk! 00:21, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Presbyterian Church in Korea (BoSuHapDong III.)

Presbyterian Church in Korea (BoSuHapDong III.) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A follow-up to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Korea Jesus Presbyterian Church with a single page nominated rather than a bundle.

Bosu Hapdong (Korean: 보수합동) translates as "Conservative Union". The only source is a database of Church denominations, which "did not manage to contact this church". This is insufficient sourcing to keep this as an article.

Furthermore, the title is mangled with an unnecessary

. character, and the Roman Numeral may be an invention of reformiert-online. Korean Wikipedia does not have an article on this; a cursory search in Korean did not find an immediate result for (or about) any group of this name.

For a potential redirect, it is unclear what the target would be: Presbyterian Church of Korea, Presbyterianism in South Korea, or a new page. Walsh90210 (talk) 00:32, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Presbyterianism in South Korea. seefooddiet (talk) 09:15, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Reformiert-online is not in any way a reliable source, and I can find no other evidence for the existence of a church under this name, making a redirect unwarranted. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:30, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. There is a consensus among participants that this article subject demonstrates notability given the sources found. I hope they can get added to the article. Liz Read! Talk! 00:19, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jessica Morse

AfDs for this article:
Jessica Morse (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable congressional candidate and state government official. Page previously created and deleted back in 2018 (though that was before her state government service). Of the 24 sources cited on the page: 5 are WP:ROTM coverage of her campaigns, 3 are press releases, 6 are articles about wildfires that quotes her a few times, 3 only mention her in passing, 2 are pages on government websites, 2 are recordings of state legislative committee hearings, 1 doesn't even mention her at all, and only 3 are actual in-depth interviews or profiles with local outlets. Someone is not inherently notable just because they ran for Congress and held a relatively minor position in state government, and the coverage I'm seeing here doesn't convince me she meets GNG. BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 00:20, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. You're right that running by itself does not make one notable. However, she's still notable for her work regarding wildfires which came after the page was deleted originally, and as I see it she definitely meets GNG. First there's this Sacramento Bee story, which despite being "local" as you say, is still 27th largest paper in the U.S., so it's not exactly a small town paper. This is also, though local, still notable enough to help with GNG I think. Then of course there's this profile which is not local at all. There are also things like this, which while they aren't profiles, are more than just passing mentions or quotes, and treat her as notable. If that wasn't enough though I've found a few other things as well via a quick Google search: this 2022 interview on KQED (second half turns into an interview of her background and life after talking about wildfires), this is a Dailykos profile, which although about the election still goes into detail about her; and finally here is another Sac Bee story, this one on her getting the Deputy Secretary job. There's more, but I think with the things I've already mentioned she safely passes GNG. Relinus (talk) 02:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - This is not her first run for office, and most likely will not be her last. What makes her notable, are her public services, within California as well as on a national level. — Maile (talk) 03:21, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I agree with @Relinus, easily passes GNG Filmforme (talk) 19:03, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I submitted this article via the AfC process even though I didn't have to, and it was quickly approved. Why re-litigate?
I will respond to the substance of your comments later today or tomorrow. Thiesen (talk) 20:20, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I agree that running for Congress does not make Morse notable, but her work in wildfire resilience, having attracted sufficient new coverage, does. As an expert on wildfire resilience, Morse is often quoted and invited to speak on the subject.
I had nothing to do with the 2018 article that @BottleOfChocolateMilk mentions. IMO deleting it was correct because Morse was not notable enough at the time.
I chose the sources for verifiability. Here are some that, IMO, also support notability. Other editors may disagree on some of these, and if you disagree I welcome your feedback, but I think GNG is quite clear:
I will add at least one of the sources suggested by @Relinus.
I believe that Morse's work in wildfire resilience has saved lives and helped California homeowners to afford fire insurance. Coverage in the news media recognizes the importance of her work. Thiesen (talk) 00:35, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz Read! Talk! 00:15, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nisar Safdar Khan Jadoon

Nisar Safdar Khan Jadoon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Being a member of the Provincial Assembly has nothing to do with being Notable especially when theres zero significant coverage of the subject neither sources to proof notability. Gabriel (……?) 00:19, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Log/2024_September_9&oldid=1246111250"
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 September 9, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.