Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Logan Grove

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ~~Soft delete, i.e. the previous PROD stands. An further undeletion request may be fulfilled again if appropriate sources are proposed.~~ (Sorry, I rushed this without thinking clearly. Thanks for the notification.)

Consensus against the notability requirements being fulfilled. -- Trevj (talk · contribs) 16:36, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Logan Grove

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was deleted as a result of a deletion proposal made by Wikipedical on 9 September 2013‎. Subsequently, a request for undeletion was made, and I restored the article. However, after waiting for nearly two months, I see that nothing whatever has been done to address the issue raised in Wikipedical's original PROD, namely "Non-notable performer; requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. None provided, nor found in Google News.", which remains just as true now as when the proposal was made, so I am bringing it here. The article does not provide a single independent reliable source. Hits from a Google search start with this Wikipedia article, IMDb, a couple of YouTube videos, Twitter, a couple of Wikia entries, a listing site that merely tells us his town of birth, date of birth, that his language is English, and a link to his web site, and so on: not a sign of substantial coverage in any independent reliable source. The article has been tagged for more sources for over 5 years, to no avail. JamesBWatson (talk) 16:53, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me What did he do now? 17:43, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me What did he do now? 17:44, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I'd say he passes WP:NACTOR. He has the main role in a notable television series, and had major roles in What Just Happened and Beverly Hills Chihuahua 3: Viva la Fiesta!. While these movies and shows sound pretty bad, his roles in them are enough to satisfy the guideline for me. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 21:14, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:41, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:03, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete JamesBWatson has ably summarized the lack of general notability, so I agree that WP:NACTOR is the only hope for this article. As far as I can tall, however, the subject has not had "significant roles in multiple...productions". The only significant role he has had was as the voice of the protagonist in The Amazing World of Gumball, a role he no longer has. His other roles were all quite minor. --Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 19:31, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. JamesBWatson has said it succinctly. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:02, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per above. To refute the point made by User:Taylor Trescott, the two movies noted are a straight to video animated sequel, and a bit part in another film. Neither in my mind makes a strong contribution to a notability argument based on WP:ENTERTAINER. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 11:05, 8 January 2014 (UTC).[reply]
Delete per nom and Eggishorn. We have been especially wary of keeping articles about marginally notable child actors. Bearian (talk) 20:39, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I agree with the comments. I found four articles on HighBeam, but he's just listed with actors for film release, etc. type articles.--CaroleHenson (talk) 03:14, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.