Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LogicMonitor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:04, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

LogicMonitor

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company that fails WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH. The current sources for the article are barely able to establish notability. Others can be found, but none in my mind are in depth enough (the vast majority are press releases along the lines of "LogicMonitor implemented this for said company") to meet Wikipedia's criteria for encyclopedic content. Of further note, nothing establishes LogicMonitor as being notably different from other cloud-computing providers, and as such the article fails WP:MILL. This subject simply has no credible claim of significance that merits inclusion on an encyclopedia. SamHolt6 (talk) 18:10, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 19:16, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 19:16, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete. Fails WP:NCORP. Staszek Lem (talk) 21:18, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:57, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Additional to the above looks like undisclosed paid editing in breach of the TOU. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 18:14, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.