Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lok Poll

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 12:55, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lok Poll (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No credible claim of notability TheLongTone (talk) 14:44, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: No coverage of the company found, only mentions in various polls, some hint of fabricated data in stories that pop up. What's used in the article for sourcing isn't RS or helpful. Oaktree b (talk) 15:23, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:11, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:23, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:57, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete superficial coverage, not notable. --Assirian cat (talk) 12:49, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.