Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Looker (Software)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:33, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Looker (Software)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

insufficient notability for an encyclopedia ; the references are mere notices of funding. The claim in the article to be the first such product is not documented DGG ( talk ) 19:23, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Dialectric (talk) 17:26, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reluctant delete. I tried to work on it a bit back in August, but agree it is too soon for Wikipedia. The current article still veers into marketing-speak a bit. Indeed, it might be the first with a total "cloudy" approach, but from the outside looks similar to similar offerings to Tableau Software etc. which are more established, and thus have a better case for notability. W Nowicki (talk) 22:59, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:33, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 02:49, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.