Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lori Pate Design

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Drmies (talk) 03:08, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lori Pate Design

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no evidence for notability DGG ( talk ) 20:02, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 01:13, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 01:13, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:33, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:33, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:COMPANY sovereign°sentinel 04:56, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as basically unsourced spam. CorporateM (Talk) 07:28, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - My searches including the simplest found nothing at all and a look at the history shows an IP located to Middletown, NY removed almost everything (which I'm not sure if that meant they wanted to remove content) but either way this is not notable to Wiki standards yet. SwisterTwister talk 05:05, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete quickly and SALT: blatant promotionalism. Quis separabit? 21:42, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Although the article is a bit troubled (especially regarding sources), I wouldn't be hasty for salting yet (if restarted with same content, maybe or yes and especially yes by third time). SwisterTwister talk 05:15, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.