Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ludovic Lebart

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Quuux (talk) 05:04, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ludovic Lebart (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article reads as a CV and a search shows no notable 3rd party coverage. Quuux (talk) 05:28, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:34, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:20, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:21, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment The GS citation profile looks strong, with counts of 2085, 1337, 595, 551, 392, 350, 320, 169, 132, 129, 121, ... (skimming the first three pages and listing in descending order). Reviews of Multivariate Descriptive Statistical Analysis: [1][2][3][4]. Review of Analyse statistique des données textuelles: [5]. Review of Statistique exploratoire multidimensionelle: [6]. XOR'easter (talk) 15:25, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I was leaning in this direction, so I might as well make it official. XOR'easter (talk) 18:20, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (talk) 16:48, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Along with the pass of WP:PROF#C1 already demonstrated, he passes WP:AUTHOR for the multiple reviews of his books, some of which I have added to the article. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:55, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.