Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LuminAID (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗plicit 12:07, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

LuminAID (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no evidence of meeting NCORP--references are notices of funding or press releases DGG ( talk ) 09:02, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 09:07, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 09:08, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 09:08, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. I added some product review references. I think that notability has now been established. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 09:18, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. We have WP:SIGCOV in Financial Times, Wired, Chicago Tribune and CNBC. Multiple independent, reliable sources. Passes WP:GNG. NemesisAT (talk) 19:52, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, per NemesisAT, as it passes GNG.Jackattack1597 (talk) 11:19, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.