Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lunar module (UFO)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 22:36, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lunar module (UFO)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced; no evidence of notability. Dicklyon (talk) 00:04, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett (talk) 02:26, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett (talk) 02:26, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:36, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:36, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:36, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:36, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No evidence of real world notability cited or found in search. What isn't plot summary appears to be speculation/original research. All of the UFO (TV series) fictional element articles suffer from this problem. • Gene93k (talk) 02:46, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It's easy to find more sources such as The Complete Book of Gerry Anderson's UFO or The Worlds of Gerry and Sylvia Anderson. Just another case of WP:IMPERFECT and WP:PRESERVE. Andrew D. (talk) 10:32, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article not only does not cite sources but it does not give sufficient information to establish the subject as sth more than merely a claim of TV series. Ktrimi991 (talk) 20:02, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for failing any claim to notability, being unreferenced, and blurring the line between fiction and reality. Ifnord (talk) 03:19, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.