Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lusik

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 19:42, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lusik

Lusik (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I cannot find any evidence whatsoever for the existance of this town. The only references I can find online are copies of this - frankly terribly written - article, which itself reads like some bizzare advert. I've tried looking at maps of Papua New Guinea and cannot find this place whatsoever. I believe this is either a long-lived hoax, or a very minor and non notable settlement. Trying to find any evidence of the supposed mythical creatures or the chief in the article also give no results leading me to believe this may be entirely fictional. Regardless it is not suitable for Wikipedia.

I did PROD this article but it was contested, leadimg me to nom here.

Edit; I have found some evidence of existance, https://peachin.com/among-the-tribes-of-papua-new-guinea/ but I'm not convinced this is enough for notability. CoconutOctopus talk 18:21, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lusik, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.