Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luxembourg Approach Controllers Association

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lourdes 05:26, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Luxembourg Approach Controllers Association

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL, searching for full name)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL, searching for acronym)

This organisation with a mere 21 members is not notable. It fails WP:ORGCRIT:

1,600 Google results, of which most are either link lists or just exact copies of the Wikipedia article (either in English, German, or French).
There is a single article on chronicle.lu mentioning LACA, and this is basically just a press release.

A single news article in 2016 isn't significant coverage. Newbiepedian (talk · C · X! · L) 06:28, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Newbiepedian (talk · C · X! · L) 06:28, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Newbiepedian (talk · C · X! · L) 06:28, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Newbiepedian (talk · C · X! · L) 06:28, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Newbiepedian (talk · C · X! · L) 06:28, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Luxembourg-related deletion discussions. Newbiepedian (talk · C · X! · L) 06:28, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. The French and German versions aren't any better. – Broccoli & Coffee ^{(Oh hai)} 22:33, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I found and added some more references, mostly about the association fighting government proposals to outsource air traffic control to Belgium or Germany. I think the material that now appears in the article adds up to notability. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 01:32, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:32, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete None of the references, including the ones added recently, meet the criteria for establishing notability. Most are mentions-in-passing or based on announcements or quotations provided by the organization. Delete per nom, topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺21:59, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.