Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lynn Cherny

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus that she meets WP:PROF#C1. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:20, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lynn Cherny (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A CV for an "associate professor" for a school which doesn't have an article nor even an "edu" domain. Her actual job is as a run-of-the-mill consultant. Calton | Talk 23:58, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 00:16, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 00:16, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:27, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Google scholar [1] shows enough citations for a pass of WP:PROF#C1. Her job title and employer might be suggestive for raising the question of whether she is notable, but are not actually relevant for determining whether she is notable once the question has been raised. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:29, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as meeting WP:PROF. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:04, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Passes WP:Prof#C1. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:30, 10 March 2018 (UTC).[reply]
• Keep - sufficient notability to pass WP:PROF#C1. L293D (☎ • ✎) 15:53, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.