Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lynn Murray

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:39, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lynn Murray (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The actress in question has been in touch asking for her profile to be deleted under article 17 of the UK GDPR law (Right to be forgotten). As the creator of this page, I used the db-author method but was informed this was not possible. If this new method is not correct, please can an editor reassign to a different deletion process. TheDeadRat (talk) 15:08, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD cannot be processed correctly because of an issue with the header. Please make sure the header has only 1 article, and doesn't have any HTML encoded characters.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:18, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Sadly, as a US company I don't think the UK's law apply to Wikipedia as the servers are in the US. Might want to loop wiki legal into this. Oaktree b (talk) 15:32, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi Oaktree b (talk · contribs), How would I go about brining in Wiki Legal into the debate? TheDeadRat (talk) 15:39, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    I'd have to dig around a bit to be honest. Let me see. Oaktree b (talk) 20:39, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    I asked about it here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(miscellaneous)#UK_GDPR_issue_came_up_in_AfD,_unsure_where_to_head_next Oaktree b (talk) 20:57, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE. Notability here is marginal and article creator states that the subject has requested deletion. Jfire (talk) 15:47, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Women, and Scotland. Shellwood (talk) 16:45, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Yes, per policy if she wants out, that's fine, we should Delete. Chiswick Chap (talk) 21:50, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE. Courtesy BLP delete - this individual has very few credits, anyway, — Maile (talk) 21:51, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE. — Preceding unsigned comment added by A. B. (talk • contribs)
• Delete expressly not on BLPREQUESTDELETE grounds, but rather because she fails NACTOR. I'm sceptical the films she's appeared in are notable – they heavily rely on unreliable or non-independent sources. Incidentally, the articles on these films have mostly been created by the nominator as well. I'd say this warrants a broader audit of their work for sourcing issues. – Teratix ₵ 04:30, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • This was the best source I found on Murray (Glasgow Evening Times on PressReader), not enough to pass GNG. – Teratix ₵ 04:36, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Fails GNG. Carrite (talk) 00:49, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE. I can't see any reason not to grant the request, even if it was denied (looking unlikely at this point) it looks highly doubtful it would meet WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG anyway. Shaws username . talk . 02:46, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.