Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lyst

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Enigmamsg 07:06, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lyst

Lyst (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An advertorially toned page on a private company. Significant RS coverage not found. What comes up is passing mentions, routine funding news and / or WP:SPIP. The company releases various ranking lists, which get some mentions, but it's mostly self-promotion. Does not meet WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH. Created by Special:Contributions/Cblanc1 with no other contriburions outside this topic, and then substantively edited by another SPAs Special:Contributions/BrooklynBrookeH. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:13, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:13, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 08:45, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 08:45, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lyst, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.